Ms Cohen, who lives in NSW where euthanasia is illegal, is terminally ill with lung cancer. She was given six months to live last year.
“Knowing that I had that option had a very strong effect on me which allowed me to stop being worried, anxious and fearful about potentially dying a slow and agonising death and to get on with living,” Ms Cohen said.
“What coronavirus has done is taken away that option. It’s robbed me of that comfort.”
Ms Cohen, 66, is one of a number of terminally ill Australians who had hoped to access euthanasia overseas, but whose plans have been put in limbo by the coronavirus crisis, which has sparked global lockdowns and widespread travel restrictions.
Heated debate surrounding contentious law reforms for voluntary assisted dying has been put on the backburner in Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania and NSW as the nation grapples with the fallout of COVID-19.
In Victoria, voluntary assisted dying is legal and it has been legislated in Western Australia to begin in the middle of next year.
Queensland was close to passing voluntary assisted dying laws, but Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk announced this week the legislation would be referred to the state’s Law Reform Commission for consideration, with an expectation it would respond after the October state election.
Tasmania’s Parliament was also expected to debate legislation to introduce voluntary assisted dying in August. Now that bill won’t be tabled until at least September.
In South Australia, a parliamentary inquiry into assisted dying had started, but it has been delayed by the COVID-19 crisis.
“I’m frustrated about the smokescreen coronavirus has created over other important ongoing issues like euthanasia,” Ms Cohen said. “It has let some governments off the hook.”
In NSW, Ms Cohen suspects the prospect of passing assisted dying was “dropped like a hot potato” following the state’s controversial abortion debate last year.
Go Gentle chief executive Kiki Paul said the pandemic had highlighted the inequity in accessing assisted dying in Australia.
“We’ve got one state, Victoria, where it is up and running and seems to be working well, while WA is working hard on implementation, but then there is the rest of Australia that still has no access or prospect of access,” Ms Paul said.
“Everyone should have the right to a compassionate and painless death.”
Euthanasia also remains a polarising matter for doctors. Some are strong advocates but others fear the scheme could be abused or undermine their obligations to patients.
Damian Flowers, international relations director for the Pegasos Swiss Association, a euthanasia clinic in Switzerland, said the travel ban had caused huge anxiety and distress.
“COVID-19 has been devastating,” Mr Flowers said. “The emotional toll has been enormous. Having another option is a huge relief for people nearing the end of their life.”
Only a small number of Australians travelled to Switzerland or the Netherlands for euthanasia each year. The cost, estimated to be around $20,000, means it is out of reach for many.
Mr Flowers said it was hoped the Swiss borders would reopen some time in June.
Ms Cohen said she had a decent quality of life for now and found joy in bushwalking, music and art.
“My go-to response at the moment is I’ll just have to outlive the virus,” Ms Cohen said.
“But underlying that there is a real concern. I don’t fear death, but I’m painfully aware that not all people die a good death. I don’t want to die a painful death.”
Victoria has the most conservative euthanasia laws in the world and patients seeking assisted dying must meet 68 safeguards, including having lived in the state for at least a year.